CD14 (PE)

Cat# 227403-PE-100ul

Size : 100ul

Brand : US Biological

Contact local distributor :


Phone : +1 850 650 7790


227403-PECD14 (PE)

Specifications
Clone TypeMonoclonal
Hostmouse
Sourceporcine
Swiss ProtA2SW51
IsotypeIgG2b
GradeAffinity Purified
ApplicationsFC IF IHC
CrossreactivityHu Po
Shipping TempBlue Ice
Storage Temp4°C Do Not Freeze

Clustered as porcine CD14 at the Third International Workshop on Swine Leukocyte Differentiation Antigens (Haverson et al. 2001). Immunoprecipitates a protein of ~50kD consistent with the expected apparent molecular weight of porcine CD14, and demonstrates the expected CD14 profile by dual labelling and competition studies. Further, pre-incubation of peripheral blood monocytes inhibits the binding of FITC labelled LPS, consistent with masking the CD14 LPS binding site (Thacker et al. 2001). Cloning and characterization of porcine CD14 indicates a high degree of both functional and structural conservation when compared to CD14 from other mammalian species, the gene maps to chromosome 2 and is expressed on a wide range of tissues in a manner consistent with expression on myeloid cells. (Petersen et al.2007 and Sanz et al. 2007). Cloning and characterization of porcine CD14 indicates a high degree of both functional and structural conservation when compared to CD14 from other mammalian species, the gene maps to chromosome 2 and is expressed on a wide range of tissues in a manner consistent with expression on myeloid cells (Petersen et al.2007 and Sanz et al. 2007).

Applications:
Suitable for use in Immunofluorescence, Flow Cytometry, and Immunohistochemistry. Other applications have not been tested.

Recommended Dilutions:
Immunohistochemistry: Frozen sections
Optimal dilutions to be determined by the researcher.

Hybridoma:
P2-X63-Ag.653 myeloma cells with spleen cells from Balb/c mice.

Storage and Stability:
Store product at 4°C in the dark. DO NOT FREEZE! Stable at 4°C for 12 months after receipt as an undiluted liquid. Dilute required amount only prior to immediate use. Further dilutions can be made in assay buffer. Caution: PE conjugates are sensitive to light. For maximum recovery of product, centrifuge the original vial prior to removing the cap.

Note: Applications are based on unconjugated antibody.

Applications
Product Type: Mab|Isotype: IgG2b|Clone No: MIL2|Host: mouse|Source: porcine|Concentration: As Reported|Form: Supplied as a liquid in PBS, pH 7.2. Labeled with R-Phycoerythrin (PE).|Purity: Purified by Protein A affinity chromatography from tissue culture supernatant|Immunogen: Porcine peripheral blood lymphocytes|Specificity: Recognizes porcine CD14. Species Crossreactivity: human. Demonstrates staining of both monocytes and neutrophils in peripheral blood by flow cytometry. Lymphocytes and eosinophils are negative for staining.||Important Note: This product as supplied is intended for research use only, not for use in human, therapeutic or diagnostic applications without the expressed written authorization of United States Biological.
Immunogen
Porcine peripheral blood lymphocytes
Form
Supplied as a liquid in PBS, pH 7.2. Labeled with R-Phycoerythrin (PE).
Purity
Purified by Protein A affinity chromatography from tissue culture supernatant
Specificity
Recognizes porcine CD14. Species Crossreactivity: human. Demonstrates staining of both monocytes and neutrophils in peripheral blood by flow cytometry. Lymphocytes and eosinophils are negative for staining.
References
1. Haverson, K. et al. (1994) Characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific for monocytes, macrophages and granulocytes from porcine peripheral blood and mucosal tissues. J. Imm. Methods. 170: 233-245. 2. Thacker, E. et al. (2001) Summary of workshop findings for porcine myelomonocytic markers. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 80: 93-109. 3. Thorgersen, E.B. et al. (2010) CD14 inhibition efficiently attenuates early inflammatory and hemostatic responses in Escherichia coli sepsis in pigs. FASEB J. 24: 712-22. 4. Goujon, J.M. et al. (2000) Influence of cold-storage conditions on renal function of autotransplanted large pig kidneys. Kidney Int. 58: 838-50. 5. Li, Y. et al. (2014) Identification of apoptotic cells in the thymus of piglets infected with highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Virus Res. pii: S0168-1702(14)00173-7. 6. Summerfield, A. et al. (2003) Porcine peripheral blood dendritic cells and natural interferon- producing cells. Immunology. 110: 440-9. 7. Vanderheijden, N. et al. (2003) Involvement of sialoadhesin in entry of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus into porcine alveolar macrophages. J Virol. 77: 8207-15. 8. Barratt-Due, A. et al. (2011) Ornithodoros moubata Complement Inhibitor Is an Equally Effective C5 Inhibitor in Pigs and Humans. J Immunol. 187: 4913-9. 9. Hauet, T. et al. (2002) Polyethylene glycol reduces the inflammatory injury due to cold ischemia/reperfusion in autotransplanted pig kidneys. Kidney Int. 62: 654-67. 10. Kapetanovic, R. et al. (2012) Pig bone marrow-derived macrophages resemble human macrophages in their response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol. 188: 3382-94. 11. Thorgersen, E.B. et al. (2009) Inhibition of complement and CD14 attenuates the Escherichia coli-induced inflammatory response in porcine whole blood. Infect Immun. 77: 725-32. 12. Zelnickova, P. et al. (2007) Intracellular cytokine detection by flow cytometry in pigs: fixation, permeabilization and cell surface staining. J Immunol Methods. 327: 18-29. 13. Facci, M.R. et al. (2011) Stability of expression of reference genes in porcine peripheral blood mononuclear and dendritic cells. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 141: 11-5. 14. Koutná, I. et al. (2012) Flow Cytometry Analysis of Intracellular Protein In: Flow Cytometry - Recent Perspectives, Schmid, I. (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51- 15. Facci, M.R. et al. (2010) A comparison between isolated blood dendritic cells and monocyte-derived dendritic cells in pigs. Immunology. 129: 396-405. 16. Schierack, P. et al. (2009) Effects of Bacillus cereus var. toyoi on immune parameters of pregnant sows. Vet Immunol Immunopathol.127: 26-37. 17. Lundeland, B. et al. (2011) Severe gunshot injuries in a porcine model: impact on central markers of innate immunity. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 55: 28-34. 18. Thorgersen, E.B. et al. (2008) Cyanobacterial LPS antagonist (CyP)-a novel and efficient inhibitor of Escherichia coli LPS-induced cytokine response in the pig. Mol Immunol. 45: 3553-7. 19. Schierack, P. et al. (2007) Bacillus cereus var. toyoi enhanced systemic immune response in piglets. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 118: 1-11. 20. Ondrackova, P. et al. (2012) Interaction of porcine neutrophils with different strains of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Vet Microbiol. 160: 108-16. 21. Ondrackova, P. et al. (2012) Phenotypic characterisation of the monocyte subpopulations in healthy adult pigs and Salmonella-infected piglets by seven-colour flow cytometry. Res Vet Sci. pii: S0034-5288(12)00256-1. 22. Vicenova, M. et al. (2014) Evaluation of in vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory activity of biologically active phospholipids with anti-neoplastic potential in porcine model. BMC Complement Altern Med. 14: 339.